Important Update from the Administrator
to the restrictions in place across the country as a result of Covid-19, the
Implementation Date of this class action has been deferred to June 30, 2020.
Administrator is accepting claim submissions, however the review and
processing of claims will only commence on the Implementation Date of
June 30, 2020. For greater clarity, the Claims Period will now commence
on the Implementation Date of June 30, 2020; therefore, claimants have
180 days from this date, to submit their claim forms.
thank you for your patience and understanding.
Are you a female or identify as a female and work or volunteer with the RCMP now or did so in the past?
Did you experience gender or sexual orientation-based harassment or discrimination while working with the RCMP?
On November 2, 2017, Cheryl Tiller, Mary-Ellen Copland, and Dayna Roach ("Plaintiffs") initiated a Federal Court Action against Canada ("Defendant"), with allegations of gender and sexual orientation-based harassment and discrimination within
the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”). Following discussions, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant ("Parties") came to a settlement with an agreement to resolve all claims of Class Members who suffered injury as a consequence of such harassment and discrimination as outlined in the
Final Settlement Agreement ("Agreement").
On March 10, 2020 the Federal Court of Canada approved the Agreement.
The Parties recognize and acknowledge that gender and sexual based harassment, gender and sexual orientation based discrimination, and sexual assault, including physical assault in the course of conduct constituting gender and sexual orientation based harassment have no place in the RCMP.
Who is Eligible?
Primary Class Members
The Agreement recognizes as Class Members, women who experienced gender or sexual orientation-based harassment or discrimination while working or volunteering with the RCMP, during the Class Period (September 16, 1974 to July 5, 2019).
This includes current and former living Municipal Employees, Regional District employees, employees of non-profit organizations, volunteers, Commissionaires, Supernumerary Special Constables, consultants, contractors, public service employees, students, members of integrated policing units and persons from outside agencies and police forces who are female or publicly identify as female and who were supervised or managed by the RCMP or who worked in an RCMP controlled workplace during the Class period.
Individuals who were Class Members in the
Merlo/Davidson class action, the
Ross/Roy/Satalic class action, the
Association des membres de la police montée du Québec inc., Gaétan Delisle, Dupuis, Paul, Lachance, Marc v. HMTQ class action, or those who have
already been compensated from any source for the same injury(ies) and event(s) are
not eligible for compensation under this Agreement.
Please refer to the Final Settlement Agreement for the comprehensive statement on who is included in the definition of a Primary Class Member.
Secondary Class Members
Family members of claimants whose claims have been assessed at either of Level 5 or Level 6 may also be eligible for compensation as Secondary Class Members.
Claim forms for
Secondary Class Members will be provided to the Primary Class Member if they are assessed at either of Level 5 or Level 6 by the Assessor.
Further details associated with this process can be found in Schedule B to the Agreement.
The Claims Process
Below is a summary of the steps in the Claims Process outlined in
Schedule B to the Final Settlement Agreement.
1. Administrator intake and review
The Administrator receives the claim package and reviews to ensure all required sections of the claim form are completed, all signatures (claimant and witness) are present and the package includes a copy of government-issued photo identification. If anything is missing, the Administrator will contact the claimant
Next, the Administrator reviews the claim package and makes a preliminary recommendation on whether the claimant is a Class Member
The Administrator's review involves checking the List of Primary Members provided by Canada, and if necessary, seeking information directly from the claimant or from a third party if the claimant is not on the List (keeping in mind the importance of maintaining confidentiality)
The Administrator will also check to see if the claimant's name is on the list of individuals paid prior compensation by Canada
When the claim is deemed complete by the Administrator, it is assigned to the Assessor for review
Assessor claim review and Level determination
The Assessor reviews the Claim Form and all supporting documents, and makes their assessment based on the incidents the claimant describes and the information provided
The Assessor reviews the claim in context of a harm grid which includes six levels of severity and associated compensation:
- Level 1 - Minimal Injury $10,000
- Level 2 - Mild Injury $35,000
- Level 3 - Low Moderate Injury $70,000
- Level 4 - Upper Moderate Injury $100,000
- Level 5 - Significant Injury $150,000
- Level 6 - Severe Injury $220,000
If a claim is assessed at Level 1, the Assessor's decision and cheque are sent to the claimant and the claim is closed
If a claim is assessed at Level 2, the claimant is notified of this assessment and provided with the option to submit a
Request for Reconsideration of a Level 2 Claim
The claimant has 30 days to submit this request along with new information which shows the Assessor that claimant should be interviewed
If no request for reconsideration is received within 30 days, the Assessor's decision and cheque are sent to the claimant and the claim is closed
If a claim is assessed at Level 3 to 6, the Assessor will conduct an in-person interview with the claimant prior to finalizing the level determination decision
3. Assessor interviews and Level determination
If the Assessor determines that the claimant should be interviewed, the office of the Assessor will be in touch with the claimant or her lawyer to schedule the interview
The details of the interview (location, format, terms etc.) will be explained to the claimant as part of the scheduling process
Please note, the claimant's lawyer will not be permitted to participate in interviews, however, claimants may have a friend, family member, or treating health care professional present at the personal interview for the purpose of providing emotional support
Following the interview, the Assessor's final decision and cheque are sent to the claimant and the claim is closed
4. Other considerations
Except for a limited right to seek Reconsideration of a Level 2 Assessment, the decision of the Assessor is final and not subject to appeal or judicial review
Claimants who are required to travel more than 50 km from their home to attend an interview with the Assessor will be reimbursed for their expenses, in accordance with the
National Joint Council Travel Directive, after submitting a
Travel Claim Form.
The Administrator operates independently in
fulfilling the duties of the Administrator set out in the Agreement. The Administrator is not an agent, servant or employee of Canada or a government institution for any purpose, and acts solely on its own behalf, as agreed to jointly by the Parties to the Agreement and as authorized by the Court.
The role of the Administrator is to carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned in respect of the Claims Process in
Schedule B to the Agreement.
The Federal Court appointed Deloitte LLP as Administrator on March 10, 2020.
The Assessors operate independently in fulfilling their mandate. The Assessors do not report to the RCMP or the Government of Canada.
The Assessors' role is to review, evaluate and render decisions in respect of all claims, and award compensation in accordance with the terms of the Final Settlement Agreement reached by the parties and approved by the Federal Court.
The Assessor will retain the services of the professionals as necessary to assist in accomplishing their mandate. All those retained by the Assessor are sworn to secrecy and must respect the confidentiality of the claims.
The Federal Court appointed
Louise Otis, Pamela Kirkpatrick, and Kathryn Neilson as the Independent Assessors on March 10, 2020.
Louise Otis is an
active judge, arbitrator and mediator in administrative and commercial
matters. She is also Adjunct Professor at McGill University, Faculty of
Law (McGill) and a Distinguished Fellow at the International Academy of
Mediators (IAM), which sets the standards and qualifications of
professional mediators in commercial disputes. She is the President of the
Administrative Tribunal of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), President of the Administrative Tribunal of the
Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF), and Deputy Judge of the
European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
Administrative Tribunal (EUMETSAT). Louise Otis regularly participates in
international governance and justice reform missions.
Pamela Kirkpatrick is a
retired lawyer and judge, with a legal career spanning over 41 years. After
obtaining her LL.B. from the University of British Columbia, she was called to
the British Columbia bar in 1978, and joined Shrum, Liddle & Hebenton
(which later merged with McCarthy Tetrault), practicing in their litigation
department for 11 years. Pamela was chosen as one of the first ten Masters to
be appointed in the province of British Columbia, and in 1992, was appointed to
the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Justice Kirkpatrick was appointed to the
Court of Appeal for British Columbia in 2005, where she remained until her
retirement in 2019. Throughout her career, Justice Kirkpatrick played an
active role in the legal community. In addition to undertaking various speaking
and teaching engagements in the areas of Family and Bankruptcy Law, she has
contributed to numerous publications for the Continuing Legal Education Society
of British Columbia. Justice Kirkpatrick has also served as Governor of the Law
Foundation of British Columbia and Director of the British Columbia Library
Society, while maintaining her role as Chair of the Minister’s Advisory
Committee on Judicial Appointments for British Columbia.
Kathryn Neilson is a
retired lawyer and judge. She obtained her LL.B. from Dalhousie University, and
holds masters degrees in psychology (U.B.C.) and law (University of Oxford).
Her legal career in Vancouver included service as Crown counsel, and private
practice in the fields of civil litigation, administrative law, and criminal
law. As well, she trained and worked as a mediator and served as a part-time
adjudicator for the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal. Her international experience
included volunteer legal work in South Africa and a year spent as a human
rights officer for the United Nations in Cambodia. In 1999, Kathryn was
appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and in 2008 to the British
Columbia Court of Appeal, retiring in 2016. During her career at the Bar and on
the Bench, Kathryn served on a number of professional and community boards and
committees. She also taught part-time at the U.B.C. and University of Victoria
law schools, and was engaged in continuing legal education for lawyers and
judges. Between 2002 and 2006 she chaired the Federal Judicial Appointments
Committee of B.C. Since retirement, Kathy has welcomed having more time to
engage in volunteer activities, travel, and pursue the outdoor activities she
Adobe Acrobat is required to view these documents. To download Adobe Acrobat, click here.
Documents and Notices
Final Settlement Agreement with Order
- Order (Counsel Fees)
- Long Form Notice
Individual Application (Claim) Form
How to submit your Claim
The claims process is non-adversarial and designed to be easy to access. There is no requirement to be represented by a lawyer. Should you wish to obtain legal advice you may contact class counsel or a lawyer of your choice. Class counsel fees are outlined in the Order (Counsel Fees), all other legal advice and associated fees are the responsibility of the claimant.
Claim Documents - to be completed by
all claimants or their legal representative
Claim Documents - to be completed in
*Note, these documents will be available at a later date, after the Assessor's Decision of a claim.
Request for Reconsideration of a Level 2 Claim
Secondary Class Member Claim Form
- Deadline Extension Request Form
Travel Claim Form
Submission Process - Please send your completed Claim Form and all related documents to:
RCMP Class Action - Office of the Administrator, c/o Deloitte
By Mail: 8 Adelaide Street West, Suite 200, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5H 0A9, or
By Fax: 416-366-1102, or
Progress of the Claims Process
Information below is current as of March 11, 2020:
Number of Claims received by Administrator: 0
Number of Claims assigned to the Assessor: 0
Number of Decisions rendered by the Assessor: 0
Please refer to the FAQ document for information and answers to questions you may have.
If you have additional questions or require assistance, please contact the parties as indicated below.
The office of the Administrator can assist you with questions you may have regarding the administration of the Settlement and the claims process, however, cannot provide you with legal advice.
For legal advice or assistance with completing your Claim Form, you may contact Class Counsel: Klein Lawyers LLP or Higgerty Law, or a lawyer of your choice. Note, legal advice and associated fees are the responsibility of the claimant.
All communication is completely confidential and your requests for information will be held in the strictest confidence.
Mail: RCMP Class Action - Office of the Administrator, c/o Deloitte. 8 Adelaide Street West, Suite 200, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5H 0A9